httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ruediger Pluem <>
Subject Re: caching partial repsonses
Date Fri, 03 Sep 2010 06:49:45 GMT

On 09/03/2010 02:13 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 03 Sep 2010, at 12:53 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
>> I disagree about 'broken': a cache isn't *required* to cache ranges.
> I definitely agree that a cache isn't required to cache ranges, but
> right now mod_cache actively forbids the caching of ranges by an
> implementation, and that's the behaviour that's currently broken.
>> As for third-party backends, this change is at serious risk of breaking
>> anything that has (perfectly reasonably) ignored range responses.
>> Fine for trunk, but not for a stable branch.

Good catch Nick.

> Good point, in that case I withdraw the backport, this makes sense.

But in this case we should backport

to fix PR49113, which would have been fixed by other means by Grahams
backport proposal.



View raw message