httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org>
Subject Re: caching partial repsonses
Date Fri, 03 Sep 2010 06:49:45 GMT


On 09/03/2010 02:13 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 03 Sep 2010, at 12:53 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> 
>> I disagree about 'broken': a cache isn't *required* to cache ranges.
> 
> I definitely agree that a cache isn't required to cache ranges, but
> right now mod_cache actively forbids the caching of ranges by an
> implementation, and that's the behaviour that's currently broken.
> 
>> As for third-party backends, this change is at serious risk of breaking
>> anything that has (perfectly reasonably) ignored range responses.
>> Fine for trunk, but not for a stable branch.

Good catch Nick.

> 
> Good point, in that case I withdraw the backport, this makes sense.

But in this case we should backport

https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=933919

to fix PR49113, which would have been fixed by other means by Grahams
backport proposal.

Regards

RĂ¼diger



Mime
View raw message