Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61594 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2010 09:16:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Aug 2010 09:16:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 95635 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2010 09:16:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 95075 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2010 09:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 95067 invoked by uid 99); 5 Aug 2010 09:16:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:16:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [130.239.18.156] (HELO mail.acc.umu.se) (130.239.18.156) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:15:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by amavisd-new (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3ACE54 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:15:33 +0200 (MEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at acc.umu.se Received: by mail.acc.umu.se (Postfix, from userid 12143) id BAFB1E52; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:15:32 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.acc.umu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96B0E51 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:15:32 +0200 (MEST) Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:15:32 +0200 (MEST) From: Niklas Edmundsson To: "dev@httpd.apache.org" Subject: Re: Failing startup for vhost configuration problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201008042157.26413.sf@sfritsch.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > On Thursday, August 5, 2010, Stefan Fritsch wrote: >> On Tuesday 03 August 2010, Dan Poirier wrote: >>> I'd like to propose that in 2.3/2.4, we fail startup for any of the >>> virtual host misconfigurations for which behavior is undefined but >>> right now we only issue a warning. > Perhaps warnings around bad MPM configuration can be reviewed as well. >> From memory it doesn't at the moment warn you when something like > StartServers is set over what it can be based on MaxClients and > ThreadsPerChild. I think it may just silently reduce the value. Since > MPM settings are often misunderstood, better hints about bad > configuration there would be useful. +1 on both suggestions. This would be a good time to change/improve on this front. /Nikke -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Niklas Edmundsson, Admin @ {acc,hpc2n}.umu.se | nikke@acc.umu.se --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Window-screen: An arrangement for keeping flies in. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=