hello clere
----- Original Message -----
From: "jean-frederic clere" <jfclere@gmail.com>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tproxy2 patch to the apache 2.2.15
> On 08/03/2010 04:57 PM, JeHo Park wrote:
>> hello ~
>> it's my first mail to apache dev .. and i am beginner of the apache. :-)
>
> Interesting stuff... But:
> - The machine depend stuff in httpd usually goes to APR. (I would add
> the logic to APR and have a HAVE_APR_TPROXY*).
i absolutely understood what you said
> - The kernel is nice but was it accepted in the current kernels? If yes
> since when?
no, i just ported tproxy2 kernel patch [refer the linke below] to the CentOS kernel 2.6.18-194.el5
the mainstream of linux kernel applied tproxy4 from the version 2.6.24
but tproxy2 had not been applied ..
http://www.balabit.com/downloads/files/tproxy/
> - Without the performance results it is hard to see if it is worth the
> effort.
>
please check the link below
http://211.174.184.69/kisa-avalanche2900-20100712
and the test-result.ppt files shows the summarized result of the performance test and etc
> Cheers
>
> Jean-Frederic |