Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-69008-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 14034 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2010 11:48:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jul 2010 11:48:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 30630 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2010 11:48:40 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 30231 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2010 11:48:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@httpd.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@httpd.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 30223 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2010 11:48:35 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:48:35 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of trawick@gmail.com designates
 74.125.83.45 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.83.45] (HELO mail-gw0-f45.google.com) (74.125.83.45)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:48:28 +0000
Received: by gwj21 with SMTP id 21so1264566gwj.18
        for <dev@httpd.apache.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 04:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=jrp+3SH8jdPMiv1eP2uk/UIAECINxrAGc+azCHET8/0=;
        b=YV34ZVa40Wew6N231VFGoxQkFu8gjLC24aboUlfMVCUVcH4IqFiRfEWA9Bgt0L2Lpq
         uGC76PkQkeGPnt4U/n7mq/0hmbtotvxNf8/rL9knD7ONqR1/VUB9DMB3nt9nwgpGOeYN
         Z4gQGbBUpYIhfM3I9zs7HZOA39PpcaKSAcotA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=FPh0KrA4/zdHsDARREHyhFGEYMMchZ4K22a/7VKx7wwp0XBNRo01pxFLAd1eaXmlw5
         j8T7P9iHdzIb7gUCYsxnv5d4hk4mNuxxh1stNmZAc9ECmm/8tDPgIxAJaxiVhlYqRNiS
         V5WQsWW2daxPEvzhdKEGVtoVmthJcieuDegVU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.144.11 with SMTP id w11mr1060382ann.236.1279280827663;
	Fri, 16 Jul 2010 04:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.239.7 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 04:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C3FA975.7070901@primary.net>
References: <20100401224838.ED01823889B3@eris.apache.org>
	<AANLkTimEr9ASQbvN_Sl96cLxq5e6T2RXAt3Y-criiUia@mail.gmail.com>
	<1BAC29AE-3A12-48D4-BA3E-DFBEDE83653F@jaguNET.com>
	<4C3FA975.7070901@primary.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 07:47:07 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTimvBFVwiiGxzHqFeuUMCTr380np9JY6HYSgHIvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r930125 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES
	modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h
 modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c
From: Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <DRuggeri@primary.net> wrot=
e:
> On 7/12/2010 2:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 11, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:48 PM,<niq@apache.org> =A0wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Author: niq
>>>> Date: Thu Apr =A01 22:48:38 2010
>>>> New Revision: 930125
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=3D930125&view=3Drev
>>>> Log:
>>>> Proxy balancer: support setting error status according to
>>>> HTTP response code from a backend.
>>>> PR 48939 [Daniel Ruggeri<DRuggeri primary.net>]
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> + =A0 =A0else if (!strcasecmp(key, "erroronstatus")) {
>>>>
>>>
>>> Any opinions on "erroronstatus"? =A0It doesn't feel quite right to me,
>>> but I'm not confident about a replacement.
>>>
>>> Just plain "errorstatus" or "errorstatuscodes"?
>>>
>>> If normal response handling takes the same action on other status
>>> codes (I dunno), maybe "extraerrorstatus" or "extraerrorstatuscodes"
>>> would be bettter?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> proxyseterror?
>>
>>
>>
>
> If erroronstatus is right out, I like errorstatuscodes best as a
> replacement.
>
> Jeff;
> =A0 I will gladly take the tasks you mentioned in STATUS as soon as we ha=
ve
> consensus on the name of the directive. It may be a lofty goal but it wou=
ld
> be great if this could make it into 2.2.16.

We may as well leave it at "erroronstatus"  I agree with Eric on
keeping your original choice and worrying about the doc.