Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89094 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2010 15:27:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jul 2010 15:27:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 34816 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2010 15:27:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 34755 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2010 15:27:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 34747 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2010 15:27:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:27:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.30] (HELO smtpauth19.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.30) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:27:36 +0000 Received: (qmail 16458 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2010 15:27:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (76.252.112.72) by smtpauth19.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.30) with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2010 15:27:14 -0000 Message-ID: <4C407A4E.8010908@rowe-clan.net> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:27:10 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe Jr." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r930125 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c References: <20100401224838.ED01823889B3@eris.apache.org> <1BAC29AE-3A12-48D4-BA3E-DFBEDE83653F@jaguNET.com> <4C3FA975.7070901@primary.net> <4C406E2A.4090204@rowe-clan.net> In-Reply-To: <4C406E2A.4090204@rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 7/16/2010 9:35 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 7/16/2010 6:47 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >> We may as well leave it at "erroronstatus" I agree with Eric on >> keeping your original choice and worrying about the doc. > > Can we drop the word error, since it has four potential meanings? > > backendfailureonstatus perhaps, or something along those lines? Hold up; see http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html fail_on_status - why would we invent new phrases?