httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" <ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com>
Subject RE: svn commit: r963195 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: ./ STATUS docs/ docs/conf/mime.types modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c support/ab.c support/suexec.c
Date Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:03:21 GMT
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Kew 
> Sent: Montag, 12. Juli 2010 09:49
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r963195 - in 
> /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: ./ STATUS docs/ 
> docs/conf/mime.types modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c 
> support/ab.c support/suexec.c
> 
> 
> On 12 Jul 2010, at 07:57, rpluem@apache.org wrote:
> 
> > Author: rpluem
> > Date: Mon Jul 12 06:57:41 2010
> > New Revision: 963195
> > 
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=963195&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Merge r955966 from trunk:
> > 
> > * Ensure that we only return a non fatal error if the 
> request is idempotent
> >  and if we did not sent any request body so far.
> 
> Plus a lot of propchanges.  Was that intentional, and if so 
> shouldn't it have
> been mentioned in the commit message?

That always happens if you use svn merge with and svn client > 1.4.
I don't know why. Seems to be related to merge tracking.

Regards

Rüdiger


Mime
View raw message