httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.2.16
Date Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:56:07 GMT
On 22.07.2010 11:28, Paul Querna wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Rainer Jung<rainer.jung@kippdata.de>  wrote:
>> On 22.07.2010 07:46, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/22/2010 06:10 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 7/21/2010 10:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 22.07.2010 04:52, Paul Querna wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ack-- I could re-tag with libtool 1.x, if we don't want to ship a
>>>>>> modified apr-util.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I always use an external expat it seems :(
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> For the ASF release re-tag would be enough. There's a few people though,
>>>>> that already ran into the same problem with 2.2.15 (BZ49053). It's
>>>>> possible some distros might run buildconf before providing their source
>>>>> bundles, but it could also just have been those users themselves. The
>>>>> info given in the issue does not clarify this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since the buildconf bug itself is not a regression and there are well
>>>>> known workarounds I would say re-tag and fix with 2.2.17.
>>>>
>>>> AIUI - this is a reroll, but the tag remains the same?  If the source
>>>> files
>>>> in svn are nonvolatile, then going with libtool 1.x might be the ticket.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1 to reroll. The tag can stay the same.
>>
>> Don't know why Paul and me both used the wording re-tag when talking about a
>> procedure that doesn't change the svn sources. So yes, I meant re-roll.
>
> re-rolled using libtool 1.x, tarballs in the same places.

EU mirror was updated quickly, but US mirror still shows the old files.

New ones are dated "22-Jul-2010 09:23", httpd-2.2.16.tar.gz.md5 is:

7f33f2c8b213ad758c009ae46d2795ed *httpd-2.2.16.tar.gz

Rainer

Mime
View raw message