Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33376 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 16:33:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 16:33:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 27541 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 16:33:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 27429 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2010 16:33:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 27421 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2010 16:33:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:33:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of DRuggeri@primary.net designates 216.87.38.208 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.87.38.208] (HELO mail8.primary.net) (216.87.38.208) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:33:24 +0000 Received: from home.simonrage.com ([216.114.77.126]:32868 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mail8.primary.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OTdh4-0004lo-45 for dev@httpd.apache.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:29:55 -0500 Message-ID: <4C2A1F81.7010507@primary.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:29:53 -0500 From: Daniel Ruggeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Vote requested Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "mail8.primary.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, folks; Jeff had kindly committed a STATUS update for a 2.2 patch for bug 48939 about a month ago for me. I just noticed that William commented while I was out of town that lest Jeff votes (or presumably others vote) he will remove the item from STATUS. I was hoping to draw the attention of (Jeff and) the committers in hopes of getting the needed votes. I would appreciate it if anyone could take a moment to review or offer questions/comments. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.2 points, 8.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, folks; Jeff had kindly committed a STATUS update for a 2.2 patch for bug 48939 about a month ago for me. I just noticed that William commented while I was out of town that lest Jeff votes (or presumably others vote) he will remove the item from STATUS. I was hoping to draw the attention of (Jeff and) the committers in hopes of getting the needed votes. I would appreciate it if anyone could take a moment to review or offer questions/comments. Thank you for your time. -- Daniel Ruggeri