Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94641 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2010 02:35:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Jun 2010 02:35:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 82484 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2010 02:35:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 82119 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2010 02:35:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 82109 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2010 02:35:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 02:35:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.30] (HELO smtpauth19.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.30) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 02:35:10 +0000 Received: (qmail 5250 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2010 02:34:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (76.252.112.72) by smtpauth19.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.30) with ESMTP; 14 Jun 2010 02:34:48 -0000 Message-ID: <4C159540.3080007@rowe-clan.net> Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:34:40 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe Jr." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org CC: Stefan Fritsch Subject: Re: Bumping autoconf AC_PREREQ to 2.60? References: <4C11D0F6.6010104@apache.org> <201006122107.04378.sf@sfritsch.de> <4C14C112.9090104@apache.org> <4C14CC20.50204@kippdata.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/13/2010 7:33 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > If we want to support autoconf 2.59, it seems much easier to just > backport the autoconf macro. And in that way, non-gcc users would > benefit as well. Please report back on the licensing of that macro.