httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" <ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com>
Subject RE: [PATCH] PR 17629 and all that
Date Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:17:29 GMT
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Orton 
> Sent: Dienstag, 8. Juni 2010 17:36
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR 17629 and all that
> 
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 05:20:16PM +0200, "Plüm, Rüdiger, 
> VF-Group" wrote:
> > Is it possible to have any non subrequest specific filters 
> below the ap_subreq_core_filter_handle?
> > It is no that the current patch does not handle this but 
> wouldn't it be possible
> > to just throw away any filter between
> > 
> > r->output_filters and ap_subreq_core_filter_handle without 
> any further test?
> 
> I'd spent some time working on exactly that approach, trying 
> to answer 
> that question.  But surprisingly the answer is "yes" - the 
> subreq filter 
> has ftype=AP_FTYPE_CONTENT_SET, so any filter registered with 
> an ftype 
> greater than that can be inserted and will work (so long as 
> it doesn't 
> depend on seeing EOS).

Ah. So deleting everything between r->output_filters and ap_subreq_core_filter
will not delete too much (they all belong to the subrequest), but we may miss
subrequest specific filters between ap_subreq_core_filter and the protocol
output filters if not following your patch, correct?

Regards

Rüdiger


Mime
View raw message