httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: Info: current module enable status for trunk
Date Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:26:48 GMT
On 6/2/2010 4:21 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> On 6/2/2010 3:39 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>> Mod_proxy and mod_ssl (if ssl toolkit was
>>> detected) make good candidates for moving from "no" to at least "default".
>>
>> mod_ssl was 'no' simply because of concerns about cryptographic law and
>> users in all these crazy jurisdictions.  But I'm willing to consider 'yes'
>> on the basis that if openssl is not found, the default becomes 'no'.
> 
> Did you really mean no->yes or no->most for mod_ssl?
> 
> Or are you also thinking some of the innocuous "most" move to yes
> (rewrite, expires, headers).
> 
> Finally, remember that on unix if you don't do your ./configure
> homework you end up with all this stuff static.

Sure, that's the beauty of --enable-mods-shared=most.  Yes, I meant 'most' :)

Mime
View raw message