Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 32615 invoked from network); 30 May 2010 03:20:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 May 2010 03:20:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 18093 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2010 03:20:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 18038 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2010 03:20:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 18030 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2010 03:20:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 May 2010 03:20:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.45] (HELO mail-vw0-f45.google.com) (209.85.212.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 May 2010 03:20:35 +0000 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so144vws.18 for ; Sat, 29 May 2010 20:19:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=cmvfAf3UfwypWd9EF4133eWOzJHxgy7DaY1/hshKenY=; b=VlPMSXP+c7tpSmc36+0PigvOcOFnUpaiG4Zd5unguMu/TLRw2Et2shiSnMheeGqf+c oHm6zif+pbid56g+byALF42DIv7G9VNe4OtgNOiSP5xB/gas4Ej8KRyJnGDsDmUdfYHQ kQUMgScg3hOURZFNKGjOIKGT4uxdGUSBv2viE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=FejqBaoug8AghhxbEheBVx/T2LYij8IC+o7HWbX4rf4/M2Z8QMs1k8l1A2ZSuamEPc +HmxW/le18P7+EKTSc/+r7cZdWlwZtPqXDgpvsVqt8czztj5VSRGmxxuV6t7EDahC3M1 PTCXjaO5+fUNLx3HVTAdK2jHBBJoeQ0tSsHfk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.52.210 with SMTP id j18mr1036327qag.80.1275189593609; Sat, 29 May 2010 20:19:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: justin.erenkrantz@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.51.148 with HTTP; Sat, 29 May 2010 20:19:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C01CCA0.4020104@rowe-clan.net> References: <4C01CCA0.4020104@rowe-clan.net> Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 20:19:53 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3ml3UK-XwAp0g4RCO152ymdr20s Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support compiling httpd against APR/apr-util 1.x when buildconf against 2.x/trunk From: Justin Erenkrantz To: dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 7:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Is your thinking to use a find_ap[r|u] setup that can resolve either/or > at ./configure-time? Yes. > Since we've acknowledged that apr/apu are hand-in-hand with 2.0, does it > make sense to merge these and distribute both, or to teach find_apu that > a found-apr satisfied its prerequisite? We could merge the APR-util macro into find_apr.m4 - seems like a bikeshed whether it's in separate files or the same. (I have no real preference.) > It would be good to make this painless for combining httpd and other apps > to either 1.x or 2.x apr. +1. -- justin