httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Fritsch ...@sfritsch.de>
Subject Re: Per-module / per-dir loglevel configuration
Date Sat, 15 May 2010 13:03:33 GMT
On Friday 14 May 2010, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >> For selection by module, does the facility need to be more
> >> granular than simply using the canonical source file name --
> >> the name of the file that declares the module struct?
> > 
> > I am not sure what you mean. Somehow it must be clear what module
> > is to be used for logging.
> 
> I just meant: Is it okay that, for example, the foo module is
> always known as mod_foo.c as far as logging concerned, whether the
> current source file is mod_foo.c, foo_cmds.c, foo_proc.c,
> etc.?  And you wouldn't be able to configure differenting logging
> for mod_foo.c logging vs. foo_proc.c logging?
> 
> (It is okay with me, and perhaps that's what you were planning
> anyway.)

Yes, I think that's ok. In any case I would like to hide the mod_foo.c 
from the user as far as possible and use the name of the module struct 
(minus the trailing _module). The LogLevel directive in my patch 
already accepts foo, foo_module, and mod_foo.c as names for the 
module.

Mime
View raw message