Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16352 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 13:42:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 13:42:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 43154 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 12:40:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 43121 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 12:40:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 43104 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 12:40:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:40:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of trawick@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.180] (HELO mail-yw0-f180.google.com) (209.85.211.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:39:58 +0000 Received: by ywh10 with SMTP id 10so1332597ywh.10 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 05:39:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+d1xnsPzVQYLD8f2hakcKO2p1+7JpdDNIt3gLuxfveg=; b=aALRgX5WWoOL8aS+IQfuR8NBwth6jyMI4hpMTTla0mwAcdxAwsTwV+pDpDAlJ3kjbU apy2NeZu/rbV0CT0BiobK4wMImmentKpCeVtRgkVqYEwTynAikdvCeb0J/vsc3hkfqYJ S4EJpe1njDfkIawswKWOoxLycV7b1/kXM3bBs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EmoUCOC3vt/hTnHIuRgZ/HpwO7rJ8HbHiXOGWXdRXVT6DJF95eNI65Ab2DqIgbFBZY B5W3fUvUdBBq8HaXg34yyyNolTFmo7CxfSWhvnsCFbhH80XwzMiONWakeor/OhJAVkji H84vprn3pHX9NyHDmvF7KOa3gj9Cjw2DoIEGg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.215.16 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 05:39:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BB3CE15.7070505@rowe-clan.net> References: <20100331190434.C217023889ED@eris.apache.org> <4BB3CE15.7070505@rowe-clan.net> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 08:39:34 -0400 Received: by 10.101.107.7 with SMTP id j7mr5502991anm.186.1270211974967; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 05:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r929663 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/include/http_config.h From: Jeff Trawick To: dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:35 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 3/31/2010 4:46 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >> Why not just change the signature of ap_process_resource_config() ? >> What is the anticipated use of these functions? =A0(IOW, how much pain >> does it introduce?) > > I see an advantage of two API's if we revert ap_process_resource_config() > to what it was supposed to be, a processor for a single config file. =A0T= hen > ap_process_resource_config_ex() is really ap_process_resource_configs_mat= ching() > or something like that. That is a very natural division.