httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: [Survey] Maintained builds - was Re: httpd trunk, apr/apu 1.4 branches and Linux
Date Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:10:15 GMT
On 4/26/2010 10:27 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> On Apr 25, 2010, at 12:07 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> 
>> On 4/23/2010 8:03 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>> On 4/23/2010 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>>
>>>> For those who are working on httpd trunk and Linux, what
>>>> are you using?
>>
>> You raise interesting questions about what the httpd folks actually test on
>> a day to day basis, given the dozen combinations of build approaches.
>>
>> Maintainers, which of the below do you *frequently* use during development
>> against trunk (as opposed to occasional/infrequent testing)?
>>
>> [X]  ./configure and build entirely in-tree (httpd/srclib/* etc)
>> [ ]  ../httpd/configure into a single seperate vpath tree
>> [X]  configure for separately built or OS-provisioned expat
>> [X]  configure for separately built or OS-provisioned pcre
>> [ ]  configure for separately built or OS-provisioned apr[-util]
> 
> The latter seems impossible for OS-provisioned apr, does it not?

You mean, that apr 1.4 (not apr-util 1.4) is a prerequisite?  Its true that few
vendors are likely to be shipping apr 1.4.2 yet.


Mime
View raw message