Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-67686-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 3688 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2010 15:13:27 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Feb 2010 15:13:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 95524 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2010 15:13:23 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 94723 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2010 15:13:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@httpd.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@httpd.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 94619 invoked by uid 99); 8 Feb 2010 15:13:22 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:13:22 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of trawick@gmail.com designates
 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.210.175] (HELO mail-yx0-f175.google.com)
 (209.85.210.175)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:13:14 +0000
Received: by yxe5 with SMTP id 5so5621894yxe.24
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:12:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=55Iw5ioarQi5+H6Ja5o08tJc03vkSxb6OGzU2CRb2i4=;
        b=ALNjEspnjqDAno7N/0xkcjx5GjChtkQuuzuV9NURKAnrsA29CEBuBPzILpjxSAjoeR
         nnea7AButKq0ykJVQr4w5T81liUttTnggFCQC/L0Hn0TNQxFLIetpUH+AKaxdqKOt14x
         soeYBNUZ9L8aoLh9J3aGBj76hsh/Yf9t5js9E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=Dn78ccI/7mAQ3LyAjLyZ59ZRWDMzhmjeHQQHmasAycFg5TlmYm27O5wooJdnW1IMZW
         pe84r6xjHI91aoGk0Kjw+p5lGXAh4wm8qbhPQSBCC1O7+dp9TnG9KeTkynL/+cUXk4DH
         XzVbt81uhhODTPvEX3l8cTMZ+/aZOmQN59K74=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.118.5 with SMTP id v5mr8375144anm.99.1265641973948; Mon,
	08 Feb 2010 07:12:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4B6F8997.8060608@rowe-clan.net>
References: <20100207230836.4604E29A0014@brutus.apache.org>
	 <FEA7FEE4-836B-494A-8848-2B800FE7C997@temme.net>
	 <4B6F8997.8060608@rowe-clan.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 10:12:53 -0500
Message-ID: <cc67648e1002080712q3f7d20ecw96fb07905011c586@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Cron <bugmail@brutus> /root/bin/bugcron.sh
From: Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com>
To: users@httpd.apache.org, dev@httpd.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 10:48 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
<wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> On 2/7/2010 6:45 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> ASF Bugzilla is running its weekly stats at Sun Feb 7 23:08:02 UTC 2010
>> <..>
>>> =A0 65 bugs for Apache httpd-1.3
>>
>> Now that we have lowered the boom on 1.3, shall we close it out for new =
bugs?
>>
>> Anyone have an opinion on the existing open bugs? =A0Uproot them or let =
them wilt?
>
> IMHO - either reclass them as trunk, fixed, or WONTFIX if they are n/a to=
 trunk.
>
> It's low hanging fruit for anyone on the user list. =A0What would users@ =
folks thing
> of becoming the assignee of this weekly bug list, to help out with that?

How often do these e-mails result in anything getting fixed?

Would it be nearly as useful to send only a tiny e-mail with links to
click on to see the reports for different releases?

Would it be nearly as useful to send the e-mail less frequently?