httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org>
Subject Re: svn commit: r910017 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/filter.xml docs/manual/mod/allmodules.xml docs/manual/mod/mod_reflector.xml modules/filters/config.m4 modules/filters/mod_reflector.c
Date Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:50:13 GMT
On 15.02.2010 14:40, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Graham Leggett <minfrin@sharp.fm> wrote:
>> On 15 Feb 2010, at 2:11 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>>> Can somebody besides Graham speak up for why this should be in the
>>> httpd distribution and enabled by default?
>>
>> Can you speak up and explain why it shouldn't?
> 
> AFAICT you're the only one in the world that cares about it (whether
> or not that is true; there's been no discussion).
> 
> All I really care is that multiple developers think it is a good idea
> to include it in the base distribution.  (If not, then I don't think
> it should be here.)
> 
> If there's no wider support, I'd participate in exploring another way
> for httpd developers to use the ASF infrastructure to store/maintain
> modules up until the point where they pick up enough interest among
> users or the development community to justify inclusion in the base
> and the group maintenance that implies.

+1

We should ensure that there is enough interest and support in new modules
before we add them to the base server. Otherwise we should have something
like a modules sandbox. Of course we need to take care that it does not
become a dumping ground.

Regards

RĂ¼diger



Mime
View raw message