Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of res@ausics.net designates
 220.233.103.188 as permitted sender)
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 09:02:42 +1000 (EST)
From: Res <res@ausics.net>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Formal deprecation of 1.3.x branch
In-Reply-To: <43e40e001001051231n321cd09ewfd30dd62ae2a4970@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1001060857280.31037@ebfjryy.nhfvpf.arg>
References: <6f5b6fe71001041357g76b2b22fn93d083d22a08bf72@mail.gmail.com>
 <yuatyv1uwei.fsf@slappy.mynet>
  <89dd37e1001050318m1f72e89ak588bfe05eb0dd800@mail.gmail.com>
  <89dd37e1001050611t1b314181hdae3d4d9eface86a@mail.gmail.com>
 <43e40e001001051231n321cd09ewfd30dd62ae2a4970@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; FORMAT=flowed
Content-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1001060858101.31037@ebfjryy.nhfvpf.arg>

On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Rich Bowen <rbowen@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>> Speaking from the community that provides end-user support for these
>> products, a big +1 on that proposal.
>>
> Sadly, questions will keep on showing up for a long time :(

I agree, however if it is EOL'd (yes Jeff, I agree this is likely more 
of an appropriate term :) ) you more or less can advise the requestor
they are using a very old and unsupported version and that they should use 
the current stable version 2.2.xx


--
Res

"What does Windows have that Linux doesn't?" - One hell of a lot of bugs!