Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 2041 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2010 21:29:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 2010 21:29:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 4176 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2010 21:29:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 4115 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2010 21:29:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 4106 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2010 21:29:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:29:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.242.35.75] (HELO dns-factory.at) (194.242.35.75) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:29:02 +0000 Received: from [172.17.100.14] apache@gknw.net [84.63.95.177] by dns-factory.at with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 8582 $ on Novell NetWare via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:27:41 +0100 Message-ID: <4B60AFCB.2060201@apache.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:27:39 +0100 From: Guenter Knauf User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Trawick , httpd Developer List CC: APR Developer List Subject: Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.4.2? References: <4B58A075.5000505@rowe-clan.net> <4B5CDB8A.9090900@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, Jeff Trawick schrieb: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Guenter Knauf wrot= e: >> BTW. while I was on that found that in httpd's roll.sh the gpg signing= >> part looks wrong to me - therefore I kept the way how the signing user= >> is handled same as was before in apr's release.h; but I believe it >> should be fixed for httpd's roll.sh: >=20 > I can't comment on the exact patch, but I had issues with this section > of httpd's roll.sh signing the mod_fcgid release currently in test and > had to comment out the setting of args. I have tested this signing section a bit more with gpg (the part which differs and looks wrong) and think it can be simplified like this: http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testsigning/testsigning.sh.txt please everyone who has some mins test this test script with/without username argument, f.e.: =2E/testsigning.sh httpd-2.2.14 and: =2E/testsigning.sh httpd-2.2.14 yourname and then report back if it works or not, and which tool and version you used (gpg or pgp - I bindly assumed in the script that pgp also knows of --version) thanks, G=FCn.