Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77635 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2010 09:17:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2010 09:17:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 42582 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 09:17:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 42486 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2010 09:17:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 42477 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2010 09:17:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 09:17:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 09:17:13 +0000 Received: (qmail 77579 invoked by uid 2161); 10 Jan 2010 09:16:52 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hilbert.heimnetz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183A66045 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:16:51 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B499B02.8010009@apache.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:16:50 +0100 From: Ruediger Pluem User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090823 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r897570 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_request.c References: <20100109223452.045212388906@eris.apache.org> <4B499835.2030204@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4B499835.2030204@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 10.01.2010 10:04, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > On 09.01.2010 23:34, niq@apache.org wrote: >> Author: niq >> Date: Sat Jan 9 22:34:51 2010 >> New Revision: 897570 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=897570&view=rev >> Log: >> We shouldn't need to create r->allowed_methods twice! > > Maybe we should not create it twice, but shouldn't we > > new->allowed_methods = r->allowed_methods; > > instead? Ok, forget about it. Your pointer in the backport proposal gave me the correct hint. Regards Rüdiger