Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 76.96.27.211 is neither permitted
 nor denied by domain of jim@jagunet.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Subject: Re: ITR 1.3.x Friday
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
In-Reply-To: <6f5b6fe71001060318w730addbcnd5585357717be370@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:57:57 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <29DCFFA9-10E3-498E-A367-B24D2D19B8EE@jaguNET.com>
References: <6f5b6fe71001060318w730addbcnd5585357717be370@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org

Let me know if you need any help :)

On Jan 6, 2010, at 6:18 AM, Colm MacC=E1rthaigh wrote:

> I don't think there's much interest in merging any of the patches that
> are currently in the STATUS, so I'm intending to a roll a 1.3.x
> release Friday for testing/voting. With a release next week.
>=20
> Unfortunately testing 1.3.x is more painful than it used to be, and so
> far I haven't managed to get 1.3.x to pass a clean suite of tests on
> *any* platform - but I can at least make sure that there are no
> regressions. With some massaging I can get to 96% coverage on Linux
> and FreeBSD, and 92% coverage on Solaris.
>=20
> Another interesting problem is that 1.3.x's configure/apaci doesn't
> actually work with dash - so the tarball refuses to build out of the
> box on Ubuntu and Debian. Nice.
>=20
> --=20
> Colm
>=20