From dev-return-67418-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org Wed Jan 06 14:46:47 2010
Return-Path: <dev-return-67418-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 43467 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 14:46:47 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2010 14:46:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 91620 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 14:46:46 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 91533 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2010 14:46:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@httpd.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@httpd.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 91524 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2010 14:46:46 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:46:46 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:46:44 +0000
Received: (qmail 43197 invoked by uid 2161); 6 Jan 2010 14:46:22 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hilbert.heimnetz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF646045
	for <dev@httpd.apache.org>; Wed,  6 Jan 2010 15:47:08 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4B44A26C.30704@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:47:08 +0100
From: Ruediger Pluem <rpluem@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090823 SeaMonkey/1.1.18
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r896392 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x: README
 src/CHANGES
References: <20100106111312.DA36A2388897@eris.apache.org>	<yuay6kbpb9o.fsf@slappy.mynet> <4B449D57.1010701@apache.org> <yuapr5npaqa.fsf@slappy.mynet>
In-Reply-To: <yuapr5npaqa.fsf@slappy.mynet>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On 06.01.2010 15:30, Dan Poirier wrote:
> Ruediger Pluem <rpluem@apache.org> writes:
> 
>> IMHO patches in the patches directory are as official as previous patches.
> 
> Oh, sorry, I didn't realize that.  I don't think I've ever seen a vote
> to release a patch.
> 
> 

Correct. Thats why I said "as official as the previous ones" :-).
I just wanted to point out that nothing will change regarding the status
of the patches directory.

Regards

Rüdiger