httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Evan Champion" <ev...@nortel.com>
Subject RE: todos for 2.3.1-alpha
Date Sun, 03 Jan 2010 23:38:14 GMT
Hi,

On a slight tangent, the status (in 2.2 at least) does not include the server port number.
 The vhost name is fine for name-based vhosts, but we need the port number to make sense of
the status for port-based vhosts.  Can the port be included along with the vhost name (e.g.
vhostname:port notation)?

Thanks,

Evan

-----Original Message-----
From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, 30 December 2009 10:08
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: todos for 2.3.1-alpha

Sander van Zoest wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Takashi Sato <takashi@lans-tv.com
> <mailto:takashi@lans-tv.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:27:11 -0800
>     Paul Querna <chip@force-elite.com <mailto:chip@force-elite.com>> wrote:
> 
>     > Anything else anyone thinks would be good to get in?
> 
>     How about increasing worker_score::request?
>     This was originally proposed in Oct 2007.
>     http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200710.mbox/%3CPine.GSO.4.64.0710201228590.22218@kleopatra.acc.umu.se%3E
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I know this is an old topic, but I just ran into this again. Any chance
> we could see something like this make it in the 2.3.X branch? I did not
> see a reply on this.

Wouldn't it make sense to pack multi-ascii fields in a single text block?
Folks rarely use the entire 64 characters of the remote machine or vhost name.


Mime
View raw message