httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: svn commit: r903514 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Date Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:32:32 GMT
On 1/26/2010 4:42 PM, niq@apache.org wrote:
> @@ -171,6 +168,8 @@
>      Ported to 2.2;
>        http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/protocol_headers_copy.patch
>      +1: wrowe
> +    -1: niq: this risks breaking existing apps, as discussed in
> +             comments on PR 48359.

Just to be 100% clear, you are vetoing a change which promotes one of
the two preexisting, alternate behaviors [varied based on the presence
or absence of a request body], preferring the one which applied to
all requests with request bodies [this case does not change], and
eliminating the one which applied to requests without bodies [which
further caused a segfault when headers_in is modified.]

We have no agreement with developers not to fix undocumented misbehavior.

Mime
View raw message