Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 52694 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2009 12:49:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2009 12:49:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 53867 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2009 12:49:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 53792 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2009 12:49:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 53783 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2009 12:49:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:49:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of covener@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.189] (HELO mail-yx0-f189.google.com) (209.85.210.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:49:13 +0000 Received: by yxe27 with SMTP id 27so2084814yxe.10 for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:48:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+Vgsso8VpuD00qk7tk1osiUVl2UpgzOxT1wct+6nDy8=; b=cKVFUywLo6U/tGqDurwks+5JpM2jbEfPP9zJLvaAP1TjxBMMk0sG7Rw9yKWaAGDPGt hz+iGq+qFm/+a0YW9CClM1lXtmjufCbLkjqp+vcE4BB10ukyiDa9H1m0wq6eb04GfDn6 FYgFC1ALasyoQooIbRGb5kKSdDxR4slUD1P8A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=W1JuT+u35thRaCfFPpwAz0pekjAC0skfWDMp2fQEUhPy/8Moeo520ybtdAKWacPrzt fCTn8mApm4ZYUeNc+CAfKsiTszclbb0c/MEX5UP1CYQXKKZuIhbLPjU2nQq1kCk2qZg6 g7qdYkj+cLzcxEFaUsv3sPw1wG7JlsTS0cda8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.238.4 with SMTP id l4mr5328985ybh.177.1259930932206; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:48:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B18E4D3.8070803@onelan.co.uk> References: <1082520665@web.de> <4B179985.5090908@onelan.co.uk> <1404e5910912030434h3f87f3ci2d9c9d425b9a6020@mail.gmail.com> <4B18E4D3.8070803@onelan.co.uk> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 07:48:51 -0500 Message-ID: <1404e5910912040448q7b6cf17o5b0e352e2f23c16c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [mod_fcgid] Feedback / Suggestions From: Eric Covener To: dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/4/09, Barry Scott wrote: > Eric Covener wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Barry Scott > wrote: > > > > > > > Jeff Trawick wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Edgar Frank > wrote: > > > > > > > > In the interim, is mod_fastcgi really that bad? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mod_fastcgi is fine for handling GET/POST requests, but it fails to > > > implement > > > Authorization or Authenication. > > > > > > So yes mod_fastcgi is really bad. > > > > > > > > > > mod_fastcgi has supported this for many years: > > > > http://www.fastcgi.com/drupal/node/25#FastCgiAuthorizer > > > http://www.fastcgi.com/drupal/node/25#FastCgiAuthenticator > > > > > > > It does not work or I'd have used it. And I tried to make it work. > There is a lot of missing code, compare to mod_fcgid implementation > of the same. Simple tests work for me. -- Eric Covener covener@gmail.com