On 12/02/2009 09:53 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> Yes, that fixes it, makes a lot of sense.
>
> What's interesting is, that the function address changes during the
> first restart, but not any more when doing further restarts. So the
> initial start ends up with a different load order than all of the
> following restarts. Something to keep in mind at least in case it's new
> in 2.3 - and about 60 other places to check which use optional
> functions, whether the function pointers are correctly reinitialized.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Will you commit?
Done as r886324.
Regards
Rüdiger
|