Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 59459 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2009 12:01:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2009 12:01:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 47248 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 12:01:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 47158 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 12:01:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 47143 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2009 12:01:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:01:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of trawick@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.201] (HELO mail-pz0-f201.google.com) (209.85.222.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:01:02 +0000 Received: by pzk39 with SMTP id 39so2634470pzk.15 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:00:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5lNPGwq2uX9+O1Sdehw9CXfq6xeyPzC3oRNP52a3/68=; b=JtwHcHhWBGfu7yNwhnsFDG4/UQpjBkZWVM0SzZTZ6n+NvbJlay8SakKArRUlg2ZpNi 8IqBI5y3Fm4veX8Ta6Qd2tYt9DcC3mJ4FNsv+Wd1mlJbHFclXssHgRs2bKDKEk/jO8IL aT8Hynx+srTZTF69nw3Haw4o3W9V7RyllfGhs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ul9N0qEFyXsN1/qizttvJLVtSzDvJHcCjmHrHD1AcREYa6wf723jEyKoXMgDdm0+Wv /fcoGIeqW1PPQKrgycY2q6j9zZmfb+xuRpu1R2rJWGQHokrGJfU546ZkTdRtdiKKlTYk 8z4xD7Y5qIFXDOQuWO5SJCdeLNyXnpg4vhS4E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.25.38 with SMTP id c38mr954384wfj.253.1257854441906; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:00:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1838A8E298154D6EAE6BDE9196EF7DA2@pqf> References: <1838A8E298154D6EAE6BDE9196EF7DA2@pqf> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:00:41 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mod_fcgid: add mod_status support? From: Jeff Trawick To: dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2009/11/9 pqf : > Hi, all > =A0 =A0I am new to this community, I am think to add mod_status support t= o mod_fcgid, which provide more internal information to administrators. Is = it a good idea? I am working on it now, but if someone think it's not a goo= d idea, please let me know. Sure. I'd like to see a view of processes and perhaps scores from mod_stat= us.