Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 34813 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2009 11:22:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 2009 11:22:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 44514 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2009 11:22:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 44441 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2009 11:22:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 44431 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2009 11:22:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:22:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of olafvdspek@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.181] (HELO mail-yx0-f181.google.com) (209.85.210.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:22:36 +0000 Received: by yxe11 with SMTP id 11so6166925yxe.15 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:22:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LkxDjGCtzverWn4UhnC52AsUocTjtCuuIzn+/HQXgcI=; b=e64EBttEKOeBJdi9UZLjWhL4+Xz9ywgQ4jyBpfe0MbCOecFtI0zIJoDpz0ZLDB9ndj x1ZPhJbB3FDLAkGop5XXSFVG0gbQuseP5L3Ormnm20g0jso7spKOjL5cDx0whPnL2MKZ w1v97GxfI7l/XxFFRo2L005ADkHR717LxBA0M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=AnG0O3my4NXVXY2sOJOa9+uV0TG3RWBIEn93LeLA8XuKCqSbBR36+h9iHLzL/Wj3uz s2gplH7x/g5T+2KDCCznLChRhBYU7idFkEmDzVSmzIF2qU2RwY/umtG3HgiDstgbiDt5 svkEb+N+EAttv4eFCSJ/AnbWBqC3EXWwoIIP8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.44.12 with SMTP id r12mr13352187ybr.211.1259148135103; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:22:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1083231251@web.de> References: <1083231251@web.de> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:22:15 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [mod_fcgid] Feedback / Suggestions From: Olaf van der Spek To: dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Edgar Frank wrote: >> Wouldn't it be better to have the backend tell the frontend that it >> supports this feature? Manual configuration should be avoided if >> possible. > > Yes, you're right. In a FCGI_GET_VALUES request, the backend can send > arbitrary name-value-pairs. Unfortunately there is no standard way to tell the > frontend that this feature is supported. Maybe, making the name (and expected > value) of this name-value-pair configurable in mod_fcgid could be a reasonable > way. Doesn't sound reasonable either. If you introduce such a feature, it should simply be coordinated with other FastCGI stakeholders. Olaf