Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:13:18 +0100 (MET)
From: Niklas Edmundsson <nikke@acc.umu.se>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Obsolete modules in 2.3
In-Reply-To: <1404e5910911120629j787a1d94r69c064d0873b6f68@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0911121711470.4615@hatchepsut.acc.umu.se>
References: <AB03E317-E11A-4F2D-85FD-498760D55F41@rcbowen.com>
 <4AFB8D54.1000709@rowe-clan.net>
  <13062DA9-BD1A-4DF2-BD10-054D70637B7D@rcbowen.com>
 <1404e5910911120629j787a1d94r69c064d0873b6f68@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Eric Covener wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Rich Bowen <rbowen@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>
>> As a non-scientific data point, I have never encountered anybody who knows
>> what mod_imagemap does, in all the years that I've been doing Apache
>> training. And in the 2.0-and-before days, when I would mention mod_imap, the
>> response would ALWAYS be "Apache does IMAP? Really?" Also, I have asked on
>> users@ who uses it, and received one response so far, saying that they
>> hadn't heard of it until my question, and had to go look it up.
>
> Aside from CVE queries, haven't heard a peep in years on IRC/users@ or
> even at $bigco.
>
> Maybe it's just our best, most well-documented module though :)

So drop the confusing example module instead? Or has it been fixed 
lately? ;)


/Nikke
-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
  Niklas Edmundsson, Admin @ {acc,hpc2n}.umu.se      |     nikke@acc.umu.se
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  It's as bad as you think and they are out to get you.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=