Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53104 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2009 21:23:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 2009 21:23:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 95686 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2009 21:23:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 95617 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2009 21:23:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 95608 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2009 21:23:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:23:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [72.167.82.82] (HELO p3plsmtpa01-02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net) (72.167.82.82) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:23:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 21794 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2009 21:23:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (76.252.112.72) by p3plsmtpa01-02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (72.167.82.82) with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2009 21:23:16 -0000 Message-ID: <4AFB2B3D.8050502@rowe-clan.net> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:23:09 -0600 From: "William A. Rowe Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r835046 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c References: <20091111202711.2864B23888CF@eris.apache.org> <4AFB20BC.2050301@rowe-clan.net> <4AFB2258.50208@apache.org> <4AFB22BF.4020308@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4AFB22BF.4020308@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >>> Silly question; this breaks all 0.9.7 builds, right? Is that deliberate? >> It shouldn't. Does it (no 0.9.7 at hand right now)? > No it doesn't: > > --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_toolkit_compat.h (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_toolkit_compat.h Tue Nov 10 07:55:13 2009 > > +/* ECC support came along in OpenSSL 1.0.0 */ > +#if (OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x10000000) > +#define OPENSSL_NO_EC > +#endif > + Can we PLEASE use the same hack for OCSP to avoid taking five different solutions to the very same problem set? That would be kindness :) :)