httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <>
Subject Re: [mod_fcgid] Feedback / Suggestions
Date Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:34:53 GMT
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Olaf van der Spek
<> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Jeff Trawick <> wrote:
>>> What advantages does fcgid have over proxy_fcgi (except being ready)?
>> integrated, on-demand process management
> How valuable is that?
> In most cases a static number of backends seems fine.

compared with mod_proxy_fcgi, the little or no required
configuration/management of application processes with mod_fcgid makes
it easier for newbies and/or casual users; at the same time it is
sufficient for most sites, though perhaps with a little more config
tweaking to allow higher spawn rates or larger pools per application

>>> mod_fcgid isn't in 2.2, right?
>> mod_fcgid is actually not bundled with the HTTP server.  It is
>> released on its own cycle, and supports httpd 2.0.x, 2.2.x, and trunk
>> (future httpd 2.4.x) with one delivery.
> Ah, nice. What's the reason it's not bundled though?

I expect to see relatively high activity (compared with any particular
bundled module) in mod_fcgid over the next 6 months or so.  Given

* bundling means considerable extra work to get fixes into both httpd
trunk and the separate mod_fcgid tree that would continue to support
httpd 2.0.x/2.2.x; that gets worse when httpd 2.4 is GA, as a fix
could apply to httpd trunk, httpd 2.4.x branch, and the separate
mod_fcgid tree
* releasing of mod_fcgid fixes would be held up by the httpd release cycle

> In this case, I'd love to see support for TCP/IP backends too.
> Shouldn't be too hard to implement.
>>> So what's the plan for 2.4? Have both of them? Or is mod_proxy_fcgi
>>> expected to be not ready for 2.4?
>> mod_fcgid will support 2.4.  proxy-fcgi folk(s), care to speak up on your baby?
> Olaf

View raw message