httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman <bua...@buanzo.com.ar>
Subject Re: Httpd 3.0 or something else
Date Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:59:27 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Greg Stein wrote:
> Apache remains the broad solution, but for narrow requirements, people
> will select something that is easier to handle for their particular
> situation.
> 
> I wouldn't say "wrong", but more along the lines of "not as well-suited"

I partially agree, but we have to take into account that some of those httpd's, like lighttpd,
are
replacing Apache plain and simple. Don't get me wrong. I love Apache. I've written tons of
articles
about it since the very early days. And I haven't released any mod_openpgp code for any other
thing
other than Apache for a reason: i love it.

- --
Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman
Independent Linux and Security Consultant - OWASP - SANS - OISSG
http://www.buanzo.com.ar/pro/eng.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEAREKAAYFAkr8Is4ACgkQAlpOsGhXcE1tFwCdEAEZQDVG9c2qqqqyNXwYBk2/
VgIAn2emSNcp1xwXa2bxgoK09JKMcsV4
=T/Fe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message