Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11015 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2009 15:25:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2009 15:25:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 29685 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 15:25:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 29614 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2009 15:25:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 29605 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2009 15:25:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:25:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [157.166.165.14] (HELO atlmail5.turner.com) (157.166.165.14) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:25:20 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppmprmsb [127.0.0.1]) by ppmprmsb.turner.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with SMTP id n9TFOuu4016714 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:24:59 -0400 Received: from atlmec05.turner.com (Atlmec05.turner.com [10.189.200.35]) by ppmprmsb.turner.com with ESMTP id hqdnwg05j-1 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:24:59 -0400 Received: from ATLVMX01.turner.com ([10.189.200.40]) by ATLMEC05.turner.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:24:59 -0400 Received: from 10.189.192.254 ([10.189.192.254]) by ATLVMX01.turner.com ([10.189.200.48]) via Exchange Front-End Server atlwebaccess.turner.com ([10.188.157.195]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:24:59 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.13.0.080930 Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:24:57 -0400 Subject: Re: Fastcgi, use something like spawn-fcgi? From: "Akins, Brian" To: "dev@httpd.apache.org" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Fastcgi, use something like spawn-fcgi? Thread-Index: AcpYnuU9JqFupvYBRmiI3wLbVmb+oAADROI4 In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Oct 2009 15:25:00.0007 (UTC) FILETIME=[FA92FF70:01CA58AB] X-SPF-Result: pass X-SPF-Record: v=spf1 ip4:64.236.31.0/24 ip4:157.166.236.0/24 ip4:157.166.252.128/25 ip4:64.236.170.0/24 ip4:157.166.183.0/24 ip4:168.161.96.0/24 ip4:10.0.0.0/8 -all X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5,1.2.40,4.0.166 definitions=2009-10-29_14:2009-10-29,2009-10-29,2009-10-29 signatures=0 On 10/29/09 9:50 AM, "Jeff Trawick" wrote: > There has been some interest expressed on this list from the mod_fcgid > user community to manage processes differently (e.g., independent of > load); in general, I'd like to see the proxy+process mgr solution > support requirements that would otherwise twist mod_fcgid in new > directions. The nginx community just recently released some glue between nginx and supervisord that looks interesting. -- Brian Akins