Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37863 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2009 02:24:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Oct 2009 02:24:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 30125 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 02:24:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 30055 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2009 02:24:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 30046 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2009 02:24:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:24:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.242.35.75] (HELO dns-factory.at) (194.242.35.75) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:24:44 +0000 Received: from [172.17.100.14] apache@gknw.net [84.63.54.7] by dns-factory.at with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 8582 $ on Novell NetWare via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:24:14 +0200 Message-ID: <4AC958CA.2040805@apache.org> Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:24:10 +0200 From: Guenter Knauf User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r821452 - /httpd/mod_fcgid/trunk/modules/fcgid/fcgid_pm_unix.c References: <20091004002903.1D90B23888D4@eris.apache.org> <4AC91758.8090507@apache.org> <4AC91A35.8030307@rowe-clan.net> <4AC94A39.1060104@rowe-clan.net> In-Reply-To: <4AC94A39.1060104@rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb: > But since his comment, "my friend always prefers to stay anonymous" imp= lied more > than this single patch, it seems appropriate to call out the general co= ncern. you got this wrong - I meant that he prefers so at all other places too, and not that he sends me tons of patches which I commit without crediting him. Also I would expect that someone who wants to be credited, and wants to hold copyrights on his/her submission certainly would self subscribe on the list, and submit self to the list. My friend was long enough here subscribed on the list, and posted patches, and got credited; thus it happened too often to him that he got ignored (which is a general prob which happens to many others too), and finally it was not worth for him to deal with the huge amount of spam you get as a list subscriber (yeah, not everyone has a superdooper mail filter) only for being ignored (remember I write here his opinion), and so he unsubscribed, and some time later he anyway changed provider, and is now happy without spam - so has no fun to start the spam game again. Therefore I respect his desire to stay anonymous - which means more that he dislikes to subscribe to lists, or have his mail address otherwise appear on the inet; he's not anonymous to me. Quote from him just when I told him about our discussion here: "well submit by yourself as needed to compile or leave out and have the ***** author fix when report a compiler error" G=C3=BCn.