httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: simple MPM requires apr-trunk
Date Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:21:46 GMT
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:

>
> On Oct 1, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>  On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Graham Leggett <minfrin@sharp.fm> wrote:
>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> > Yeah, but do we want to require 1.4, which means backporting the
>> > pollcb stuff, or do we want to require 2.0, which means httpd 2.4
>> > will be pushed out even further...?
>>
>> I'd say backport the pollcb stuff. httpd v2.3.x alphas are out the door,
>> while apr v2.x alphas aren't.
>>
>> I generally agree with backporting pollcb to apr 1.4.x
>>
>> you guys are confusing me ;)
>>
>> pollcb is in 1.3.x even; AFAIK it is just APR_POLLSET_NODEFAULT that
>> simple wants from later APR
>>
>>
>
> It's this:
>
>        int good_methods[] = {APR_POLLSET_KQUEUE, APR_POLLSET_PORT,
> APR_POLLSET_EPOLL};
>
> and the use of apr_pollcb_create_ex()
>
> yeah

Mime
View raw message