httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: simple MPM requires apr-trunk
Date Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:10:23 GMT

On Oct 1, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com>  
> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Graham Leggett <minfrin@sharp.fm>  
> wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > Yeah, but do we want to require 1.4, which means backporting the
> > pollcb stuff, or do we want to require 2.0, which means httpd 2.4
> > will be pushed out even further...?
>
> I'd say backport the pollcb stuff. httpd v2.3.x alphas are out the  
> door,
> while apr v2.x alphas aren't.
>
> I generally agree with backporting pollcb to apr 1.4.x
>
> you guys are confusing me ;)
>
> pollcb is in 1.3.x even; AFAIK it is just APR_POLLSET_NODEFAULT that  
> simple wants from later APR
>


It's this:

	int good_methods[] = {APR_POLLSET_KQUEUE, APR_POLLSET_PORT,  
APR_POLLSET_EPOLL};

and the use of apr_pollcb_create_ex()


Mime
View raw message