Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39728 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2009 23:55:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Sep 2009 23:55:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 43575 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2009 23:55:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 43479 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2009 23:55:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 43470 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2009 23:55:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:55:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of trawick@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.157 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.157] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.157) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:55:18 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 22so1000631fge.12 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:53:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MQ+73qjipwwRzrst9VghCq2DCVMj2zaW9ZhQYNug13k=; b=EFjMw6qN5ESsnvBDEj7K5USYQAcyd9MaK0ofK14y4yEpVtEHfgCIjKbTEmWMTMm2Ui fz64TWIqo69YoG2nJw0BazhrevhvO1UPCW5eSUlKOrfIkHQCetumQqNLFSAWk/L2m4q8 u8nI4wgLiIxu9+cWHQr48I4g04qGw5moh5/oI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=NEvo1FYgogIz+WddJKQPZ7+jab0e8PGA5iFqLhbgdnSofltskBBzj6NTFz6FYvqg6+ /EqhneH33Pg+5Z13QIzbLUv3UTsHJQzUhpAXyAAXv9yRJVFMsdYg3OWqnXMLMOoHg6Xb D4aK0T3mRchHsBCFBD0ybiN29SdvN+LxW1Jwg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.231.15 with SMTP id d15mr5580039fgh.74.1252972438011; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:53:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <81DCFB06-CAB5-423B-9ADB-F58DC9784D8C@brianfrance.com> References: <2FC23581-1BD4-4518-98DB-C38CF5F80620@brianfrance.com> <20090914210242.GA24079@redhat.com> <81DCFB06-CAB5-423B-9ADB-F58DC9784D8C@brianfrance.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:53:57 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DAV Option Patch From: Jeff Trawick To: dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0014852f578014bff9047392613e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0014852f578014bff9047392613e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Brian J. France wrote: > > > Jari is the original author of mod_dav_acl, which requires patches to httpd > to work. I need the same functionality added to httpd to get a mod_dav_acl > type module working, so I have split up his patch into smaller pieces. Can > a patch be under a different license than the original code? > Do you mean, can somebody create a patch to httpd and give the patch a different license than ASL? Or more directly, can we decide what license Jari intended, or be compelled to agree to, for his patch? We don't want to debate that here, as it is missing the point. See wrowe's post from 1-2 hours ago. The author should contribute it to us, etc. If not, we need to remove what was already committed. --0014852f578014bff9047392613e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Brian J. France= <brian@brian= france.com> wrote:


Jari is the original author of mod_dav_acl, which requires patches to httpd= to work. =A0I need the same functionality added to httpd to get a mod_dav_= acl type module working, so I have split up his patch into smaller pieces. = =A0Can a patch be under a different license than the original code?

Do you mean, can somebody create a patch t= o httpd and give the patch a different license than ASL? =A0Or more directl= y, can we decide what license Jari intended, or be compelled to agree to, f= or his patch?

We don't want to debate that here, as it is missing= the point. =A0See wrowe's post from 1-2 hours ago. =A0The author shoul= d contribute it to us, etc. =A0If not, we need to remove what was already c= ommitted.

--0014852f578014bff9047392613e--