Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13581 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 15:00:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2009 15:00:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 70180 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 15:00:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 70087 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 15:00:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 70078 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2009 15:00:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:00:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.179] (HELO mail-yx0-f179.google.com) (209.85.210.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:00:03 +0000 Received: by yxe9 with SMTP id 9so5684990yxe.26 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:59:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.174.7 with SMTP id w7mr4681495age.11.1253026782022; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:59:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.200.166? ([64.191.174.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm1593391agb.15.2009.09.15.07.59.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:59:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <97AB26BA-C45A-4617-8513-7D26C42B1C63@rcbowen.com> From: Rich Bowen To: dev@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4A9DD48B.3080708@rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: svn commit: r795451 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:59:39 -0400 References: <20090718235317.3D2D32388872@eris.apache.org> <4A64D3CA.4050300@rowe-clan.net> <4A9DA9D9.3090203@rowe-clan.net> <4A9DAE76.5000402@webthing.com> <4A9DD48B.3080708@rowe-clan.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >>> >> >> FWIW, I preferred your earlier suggestion of Fallback[Handler| >> Action]. > > If this mirrors the behavior of Action (in the way variables are > presented > to the fallback resource) then FallbackAction makes the most sense. > > If it is restricted to a filespec at the same dir level, then perhaps > FallbackFilename makes the most sense. (If it can be at the same > level > or in another path, FallbackFile or FallbackResource might be better). > > Rich? Pipe up - you know we programmers are useless for naming > things. > You make short, sweet and to the point choices. E.g., ponies. FallbackHandler sounds good to me. I can't say I'm particularly concerned about the name, as long as the functionality does what we want, but FallbackHandler makes a lot of sense. Sorry for the delay. -- Rich Bowen rbowen@rcbowen.com