Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61511 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2009 23:30:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2009 23:30:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 19024 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2009 23:30:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 18924 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2009 23:30:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 18915 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2009 23:30:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:30:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.229.52.226] (HELO opensolaris) (80.229.52.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:30:24 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (opensolaris.local [127.0.0.1]) by opensolaris (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n81NTw5H005086 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 00:30:01 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4A9DAE76.5000402@webthing.com> Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:29:58 +0100 From: Nick Kew User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090323) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r795451 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS References: <20090718235317.3D2D32388872@eris.apache.org> <4A64D3CA.4050300@rowe-clan.net> <4A9DA9D9.3090203@rowe-clan.net> In-Reply-To: <4A9DA9D9.3090203@rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Nick... > > should we discuss an alternate name? Or should I simply revert the patch > vetoed on trunk? I'm easy on the name. Let's ping DrBacchus - this was his feature request :-) > Can we compromise on the name NotFoundHandler, MissingFileHandler, > NotFoundAction, MissingFileAction, or any of a dozen other possible > variations that don't contain the misleading word "Default"? FWIW, I preferred your earlier suggestion of Fallback[Handler|Action]. -- Nick Kew