Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-Id: <42033668-C3FA-4C40-AFF2-9009D07A094C@rcbowen.com>
From: Rich Bowen <rbowen@rcbowen.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <4AAAC6DA.3000406@rowe-clan.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Subject: Re: svn commit: r795451 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:21:21 -0400
References: <20090718235317.3D2D32388872@eris.apache.org>
 <4A64D3CA.4050300@rowe-clan.net> <4A9DA9D9.3090203@rowe-clan.net>
 <4A9DAE76.5000402@webthing.com> <4AAAC6DA.3000406@rowe-clan.net>


On Sep 11, 2009, at 5:53 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

>>>
>>> Can we compromise on the name NotFoundHandler, MissingFileHandler,
>>> NotFoundAction,  MissingFileAction, or any of a dozen other possible
>>> variations that don't contain the misleading word "Default"?
>>
>> FWIW, I preferred your earlier suggestion of Fallback[Handler| 
>> Action].
>
> your input please?
>
> It would be nice to fix rather than revert, but I'll personally do  
> either
> on Monday, because we can't tag a 2.3 alpha with an veto still open.


Sorry for my lack of response. Travel, work. Usual excuses. Sorry.

FallbackHandler and FrontController both make a lot of sense to me.  
FrontController seems like it might be more "correct", in terms of  
accepted usage in the larger world out there, but either one makes me  
happy.

--
Rich Bowen
rbowen@rcbowen.com