httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r795451 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Date Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:59:39 GMT
>>>
>>
>> FWIW, I preferred your earlier suggestion of Fallback[Handler| 
>> Action].
>
> If this mirrors the behavior of Action (in the way variables are  
> presented
> to the fallback resource) then FallbackAction makes the most sense.
>
> If it is restricted to a filespec at the same dir level, then perhaps
> FallbackFilename makes the most sense.  (If it can be at the same  
> level
> or in another path, FallbackFile or FallbackResource might be better).
>
> Rich?  Pipe up - you know we programmers are useless for naming  
> things.
> You make short, sweet and to the point choices.  E.g., ponies.


FallbackHandler sounds good to me. I can't say I'm particularly  
concerned about the name, as long as the functionality does what we  
want, but FallbackHandler makes a lot of sense.

Sorry for the delay.

--
Rich Bowen
rbowen@rcbowen.com




Mime
View raw message