*Rich*,
Nick Kew wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Nick...
>>
>> should we discuss an alternate name? Or should I simply revert the patch
>> vetoed on trunk?
>
> I'm easy on the name.
>
> Let's ping DrBacchus - this was his feature request :-)
>
>> Can we compromise on the name NotFoundHandler, MissingFileHandler,
>> NotFoundAction, MissingFileAction, or any of a dozen other possible
>> variations that don't contain the misleading word "Default"?
>
> FWIW, I preferred your earlier suggestion of Fallback[Handler|Action].
your input please?
It would be nice to fix rather than revert, but I'll personally do either
on Monday, because we can't tag a 2.3 alpha with an veto still open.
|