Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
>> According to Jeff:
>>
>>> A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
>>> I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
>> I voted -1 at that time which is a veto.
>>
>> My opinion hasn't changed and I still think that it is a very
>> stupid idea to add a "feature" that allows our users to do
>> something which is stupid and absurd.
>>
>> *shrug* but as everyone seems to think that this is a good idea,
>> feel free to ignore my veto.
>
> A Veto is a Veto. If you feel strongly enough about it, then
> it cannot be, and should not be, ignored.
Lars,
yours is the last veto standing for ServerTokens Off. What say you?
(Your veto would appear to imply a veto of any ServerTokens Set syntax).
Bill
|