Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49880 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2009 06:35:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Aug 2009 06:35:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 66802 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2009 06:35:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 66573 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2009 06:35:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 66426 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2009 06:35:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:35:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of TOKILEY@aol.com designates 205.188.105.145 as permitted sender) Received: from [205.188.105.145] (HELO imr-da03.mx.aol.com) (205.188.105.145) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:32:03 +0000 Received: from imo-da02.mx.aol.com (imo-da02.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.200]) by imr-da03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n7Q6VZ1b018471 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:31:35 -0400 Received: from TOKILEY@aol.com by imo-da02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.5.) id e.c61.532e4595 (55732) for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:31:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-de03.mx.aol.com (smtprly-de03.mx.aol.com [205.188.249.170]) by cia-md03.mx.aol.com (v124.15) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMD037-b2894a94d6c1286; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:31:31 -0400 Received: from webmail-d082 (webmail-d082.sim.aol.com [205.188.181.108]) by smtprly-de03.mx.aol.com (v124.15) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDE037-b2894a94d6c1286; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:31:29 -0400 References: <4A943F73.4080900@sharanet.org> To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Analysis of the Apache web server code repository Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:31:29 -0400 X-AOL-IP: 65.66.76.215 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: tokiley@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CBF42DFA91FDDF_A48_58CF5_webmail-d082.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 44148-STANDARD Received: from 65.66.76.215 by webmail-d082.sysops.aol.com (205.188.181.108) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:31:29 -0400 Message-Id: <8CBF42DFA8D3B1F-A48-2B747@webmail-d082.sysops.aol.com> X-AOL-SENDER: TOKILEY@aol.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Flag: NO ----------MB_8CBF42DFA91FDDF_A48_58CF5_webmail-d082.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I knew Trawick was a slacker most of the time. Now there's cool pie charts and movies to prove it. ROFL Hmm... why do I get the feeling this tool's real usage is so that IT managers can see who they can 'let go'? Kevin Kiley -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Trawick To: dev@httpd.apache.org Sent: Tue, Aug 25, 2009 4:26 pm Subject: Re: Analysis of the Apache web server code repository On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:45 PM, t.n.a. wrote: I have designed a dedicated Subversion data warehouse and loading logic so that Subversion repository data can be analyzed using OLAP tools. To demonstrate the functionality, I have made a short screencast (7 minutes) using none other than the Apache web server's code repository as the one under analysis. It is fun to be in the "movies;" maybe I'll make my kids sit through it later ;)? (And I'm curious which company you found when you looked up "trawick".) But please note that ASF ids aren't shared.? It is important for the integrity of the code that we know who is making contributions.? You should remove the overlaid text that suggests that any ASF work is being done by a commercial entity using shared ids. (All I can say about when I commit historically is that I like to sleep at least from midnight to six a.m. US Eastern Time, at least when I'm at home ;)? I don't think the same is true of many other people ("wrowe").) Thanks! ----------MB_8CBF42DFA91FDDF_A48_58CF5_webmail-d082.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
I knew Trawick was a slacker most of the time.
Now there's cool pie charts and movies to prove it.
ROFL

Hmm... why do I get the feeling this tool's real usage
is so that IT managers can see who they can 'let go'?

Kevin Kiley

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tue, Aug 25, 2009 4:26 pm
Subject: Re: Analysis of the Apache web server code repository

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:45 PM, t.n.a. <tna@sharanet.org> wrote:

I have designed a dedicated Subversion data warehouse and loading logic
so that Subversion repository data can be analyzed using OLAP tools. To
demonstrate the functionality, I have made a short screencast
<http://panbi.sourceforge.net/systems/subversion/olap.html> (7 minutes)
using none other than the Apache web server's code repository as the one
under analysis.

It is fun to be in the "movies;" maybe I'll make my kids sit through it later ;)  (And I'm curious which company you found when you looked up "trawick".)

But please note that ASF ids aren't shared.  It is important for the integrity of the code that we know who is making contributions.  You should remove the overlaid text that suggests that any ASF work is being done by a commercial entity using shared ids.

(All I can say about when I commit historically is that I like to sleep at least from midnight to six a.m. US Eastern Time, at least when I'm at home ;)  I don't think the same is true of many other people ("wrowe").)

Thanks!

----------MB_8CBF42DFA91FDDF_A48_58CF5_webmail-d082.sysops.aol.com--