httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Paul Smedley" <pauldes...@despamsmedley.id.au>
Subject Re: criteria for axing MPMs from the tree
Date Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:23:07 GMT
Hi Brian,

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:12:11 UTC, Brian Havard 
<brian.havard@gmail.com> wrote:

> Nick Kew wrote:
> > Paul Smedley wrote:
> >
> >>> [ ] yank BeOS MPM from trunk
> >>> [ ] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk
> >>>
> >>> (I'm +1 on both votes)
> >>
> >> Sorry for the late response, but if there is no current OS/2
> >> maintainer for APR and httpd - I'm happy to take on that role.
> >>
> >> I've been building Apache2 on OS/2 for the last 4 years or so, I just
> >> enver got around to submitting patches.  If the support is pulled, it
> >> will make my life harder continuing to maintain the port.
> >
> > If you've been maintaining it independently to date, you could
> > presumably continue to do so on exactly the same basis if it
> > were pulled from the official release.  So that's one option.
> >
> > I see you've posted a patch to dev@apr.  I am, alas, not
> > competent to review it.  If anyone on the APR and HTTPD
> > projects has OS2 and the time to review it, maybe this
> > could be a start to reviving OS2 support, and to your
> > working with the apache community.
> 
> I know I've been absent for a long time but I once again have a bit of
> spare time so I can review, test & commit patches from Paul. Does anyone
> object if I start by bringing the OS/2 MPM back from the dead?
> Specifically, reversing r758899?

Just a comment regarding testing - I assume you only have an EMX 
environment? I'm using klibc for all my stuff - 
http://svn.netlabs.org/klibc 

It would be good to ensure that I don't break anything for EMX :)

-- 
Cheers,

Paul.


Mime
View raw message