Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 70966 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 18:02:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 18:02:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 84591 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 18:03:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 84484 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 18:03:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 84475 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 18:03:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:03:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.229.52.226] (HELO opensolaris) (80.229.52.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:03:21 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (opensolaris.local [127.0.0.1]) by opensolaris (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6HI2vCL009137 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:02:58 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4A60BCD1.9060602@webthing.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:02:57 +0100 From: Nick Kew User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090323) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Intent to T&R 2.2.12 References: <7229A546-4D5C-4DDC-BECC-0E1AA9180387@jaguNET.com> <20090717134913.GA15295@eilebrecht.net> In-Reply-To: <20090717134913.GA15295@eilebrecht.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Lars Eilebrecht wrote: > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Over the weekend I'll be doing some final things with the intent >> to tag and roll 2.2.12 on Monday... > > I just realized that I still have one patch for 2.2.12 which fixes an > SSI-related bug causing a segfault when handling regex back-references > (see attachment). Heh. Missed the attachment earlier. I've a faint recollection of someone raising this issue, but a quick google didn't find it. Do you have a test-case that provokes the bug you're fixing? -- Nick Kew