Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57629 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2009 20:01:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jun 2009 20:01:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 45374 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2009 20:01:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 45305 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2009 20:01:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 45296 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2009 20:01:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:01:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jorge.schrauwen@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.210 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.210] (HELO mail-fx0-f210.google.com) (209.85.220.210) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:01:10 +0000 Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so1148741fxm.24 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:00:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=A6AXzYJkuRmcUBvbcphfxAFpdkEOzLD3odvkMuDc2mI=; b=XgJW+ipJ9VrT6wMrv/cz/PTTCPm3i3Hxq5eSTcA4QX0ibzseOfmXNnYC3p4/9BZ7Jg TOGZ0nK+RLkf2uEj7bBu7nzBCM3egL3ZY3hD32q5IMPUfBWwNGLsGSgKipYq8v8JnlPV CqWbmN9EW3V/hWcwlb+PztFuJb9lS/0rAOw48= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=eXtHN/Iq7YuVAKf71F58X1JfasMocXDkQ1ww1FGWkENU11F5plUZQS/wvS2t5rlEgx DGQTx4T27I81TeMwSOJFGyHESV127op0+uRUeYt9SUgArIeg+dUBj7Yy5LlDXyFqIE6M 2DnPfoxgVSYVp6eB8DE+z7IH8fhzkgplsI00Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.60.15 with SMTP id i15mr1798519fga.5.1245873649512; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:00:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <43e40e000906241240k110568abnecdcf2dda40e97e@mail.gmail.com> References: <43e40e000607261310j5caba4a9we6a20a48bd631c6b@mail.gmail.com> <44C7D3A1.4040800@apache.org> <43e40e000607261400m792c5b7em74d347845a0b5da3@mail.gmail.com> <43e40e000906190930h422764d6r89482c0e920cbb89@mail.gmail.com> <43e40e000906241240k110568abnecdcf2dda40e97e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:00:49 +0200 Message-ID: <43e40e000906241300x749f2183k636e9892fbbb89e2@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Please Review! Path for os/win32/os.h - new reports Win64 when build for 64-bit From: Jorge Schrauwen To: Mario Brandt , HTTPD Developers Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd3410050715e046d1d903c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd3410050715e046d1d903c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I thought I did but couldn't find it. I've create a new bug report: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47418 ~Jorge On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Jorge Schrauwen wrote: > I can't remember, > > I'll open one tomorrow when I have access to my updated patch. > > ~Jorge > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Mario Brandt wrote: > > Hi Jorge, > > did you also open a bug in bugzilla? > > > > Mario > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Jorge > > Schrauwen wrote: > >> Sorry to dig up this old thread again but some users of my unofficial > binary > >> have been complaining that it still says Win32. > >> > >> So any chances somebody could look at this again. It's a rather trivial > >> change I think. > >> > >> ~Jorge > > > --000e0cd3410050715e046d1d903c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I thought I did but couldn't find it.

I've create a new bug = report:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D47418
~Jorge


On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Jorge S= chrauwen <jorge.schrauwen@gmail.com> wrote:
I can't remember,

I'll open one tomorrow when I have access to my updated patch.

~Jorge



On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Mario Brandt<jblond@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
> did you also open a bug in bugzilla?
>
> Mario
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Jorge
> Schrauwen<jorge.schrau= wen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sorry to dig up this old thread again but some users of my unoffic= ial binary
>> have been complaining that it still says Win32.
>>
>> So any chances somebody could look at this again. It's a rathe= r trivial
>> change I think.
>>
>> ~Jorge
>

--000e0cd3410050715e046d1d903c--