Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 64510 invoked from network); 6 May 2009 15:04:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 May 2009 15:04:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 30631 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2009 15:04:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 30544 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2009 15:04:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 30535 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2009 15:04:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 May 2009 15:04:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.232.246.85] (HELO mo2.vodafone.com) (195.232.246.85) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 May 2009 15:04:38 +0000 Received: from mi2.vodafone.com (mi2.vodafone.com [195.232.246.139]) by mo2.vodafone.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id n46F4I2b017154 for ; Wed, 6 May 2009 17:04:18 +0200 Received: from avoexs04.internal.vodafone.com (avoexs04.dc-ratingen.de [145.230.4.198]) by mi2.vodafone.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id n46F3nOg018594 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 6 May 2009 17:04:17 +0200 Received: from VF-MBX11.internal.vodafone.com ([145.230.5.20]) by avoexs04.internal.vodafone.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 6 May 2009 17:04:10 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Backports from trunk to 2.2 proxy-balancers Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:04:08 +0200 Message-ID: <99EA83DCDE961346AFA9B5EC33FEC08B021FBF9C@VF-MBX11.internal.vodafone.com> In-Reply-To: <56252D10-F82F-4E5D-96E2-9AB7A959FDBF@apache.org> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Re: Backports from trunk to 2.2 proxy-balancers Thread-Index: AcnOW1DXvAM9LefMRpWotfZbMYmgrAAAHAEA References: <4A018C0E.5010904@kippdata.de> <99EA83DCDE961346AFA9B5EC33FEC08B021FBF65@VF-MBX11.internal.vodafone.com> <56252D10-F82F-4E5D-96E2-9AB7A959FDBF@apache.org> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Pl=FCm=2C_R=FCdiger=2C_VF-Group=22?= To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 May 2009 15:04:10.0608 (UTC) FILETIME=[E92BD700:01C9CE5B] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org =20 > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jim Jagielski=20 > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Mai 2009 16:59 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Backports from trunk to 2.2 proxy-balancers >=20 >=20 > On May 6, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Pl=FCm, R=FCdiger, VF-Group wrote: >=20 > > > > The problem is that this breaks existing configurations for 2.2.x > > as the balancers are now in separate modules. >=20 > How so (the breakage, that is)?? You mean they requirement for > them to LoadModule them? Exactly. This is an unpleasant surprise for someone updating an existing installation from 2.2.a to 2.2.b. Regards R=FCdiger