httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Querna <p...@querna.org>
Subject Re: svn commit: r777499 - in /httpd/mod_ftp/trunk: CHANGES CHANGES-FTP LICENSE LICENSE-FTP NOTICE NOTICE-FTP README README-FTP STATUS STATUS-FTP
Date Mon, 25 May 2009 03:30:50 GMT
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:56 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> jim@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jim
>> Date: Fri May 22 12:49:41 2009
>> New Revision: 777499
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=777499&view=rev
>> Log:
>> No need (that I can see) to have the -FTP suffix here
>
> -1 Veto, reverting.  Not even LICENSE, which would normally be just
> the AL 2.0 can overlap, because httpd/LICENSE contains many third
> party licenses; cp -r, or svn export ftp atop an httpd tree, and
> you have just deleted the additional licenses applicable to httpd.
>
>
> The reason was spelled out in;
>
> Revision 664603 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs]
> Modified Mon Jun 9 02:10:31 2008 UTC (11 months, 1 week ago) by wrowe
> File length: 4595 byte(s)
> Diff to previous 605333 (colored)
>
> The filenames chosen for the mod_ftp repository are deliberately laid out
> to permit the user to export or unpack mod_ftp on top of an existing httpd
> tree without file conflicts.  Although Win32 and Netware still need a bit
> of patch or magic to inject the mod_ftp build into the httpd build.


that seems silly.  why can't it build like every other module does?

Mime
View raw message