httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: mod_proxy / mod_proxy_balancer
Date Tue, 05 May 2009 13:45:38 GMT

On May 5, 2009, at 8:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

>
> On May 5, 2009, at 4:45 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There are 2 weird things in the logic.
>> - In ap_proxy_add_worker_to_balancer() we make a copy of the  
>> worker, why not just the address?
>> If you looks to child_init() in mod_proxy and mod_proxy_balancer we  
>> see that mod_proxy initialise one copy and mod_proxy_balancer the  
>> other, it is working but one of the copies is never used.
>>
>> - We want the child_init of mod_proxy before mod_proxy_balancer,  
>> that prevents reset() of the balancer_method to control the  
>> creation of the worker.
>>
>
> Yeah, all on target.
>


The rub, of course, is that the inits in child_init/mod_proxy *are*
required presently... In fact, did we explicitly added the "already
inited" test due to this interaction?

Mime
View raw message